COMMUNITY GOVERNANCE

How We Organise
and Make Decisions

Transparent structure, clear accountability, and distributed decision-making for a global volunteer community.

Our Governance Principles

ETHOS governance is built on transparency, subsidiarity (decisions at lowest appropriate level), accountability, and participatory processes. We balance agility with inclusivity.

Transparency

All governance documents, decisions, and processes are openly published. Meeting notes and strategic plans accessible to all volunteers.

Subsidiarity

Decisions made at the lowest appropriate level. Country teams have autonomy for local implementation within global framework alignment.

Accountability

Clear role charters, defined KPIs, and regular reporting. Leaders accountable to community through transparent metrics and feedback mechanisms.

Participation

Community input welcomed on strategic decisions. Advisory forums, feedback channels, and consultative processes embedded in governance.

Three-Tier Model

Community Structure

Global coordination with country autonomy and role-based contributions.

Global Level

Strategic Direction & Framework Integrity

Core Responsibilities:

  • Overall ETHOS strategy and mission alignment
  • Framework integrity and quality standards
  • Volunteer recruitment and support policies
  • Technology platform and infrastructure
  • Global partnerships and visibility

Key Roles:

Executive Director

Strategic leadership and external relations

Global Programme Lead

Framework development and quality

Global Community Lead

Volunteer support and coordination

Advisory Board

Strategic guidance and peer review

Country Level

National Implementation & Adaptation

Core Responsibilities:

  • National ETHOS strategy within global framework
  • Localised toolkit development and translation
  • National partnerships and visibility
  • Country team coordination and support
  • Reporting to global team (quarterly)

Team Structure:

Country Leader

Strategic coordinator, reports to Global Programme Lead

Co-Lead (Programme)

Toolkit and training delivery

Co-Lead (Community)

Events, engagement, onboarding

Ambassadors & Fellows

Task-based contributors coordinated by co-leads

Individual Contributors

Ambassadors, Fellows, Advisors

Ambassadors

Report to: Co-Lead (Community)

Claim tasks from country board, flexible contributions, receive badges for completion.

Fellows

Report to: Co-Lead (Programme) or assigned supervisor

Project-based work with defined scope, milestones, and deliverables. Co-authorship potential.

Advisors

Report to: Global Programme Lead or Country Leader

Quarterly touchpoints, strategic input, peer review. No operational responsibilities.

Who Decides What

Decision-Making Framework

Clear authority levels for efficient, accountable decision-making.

Decision TypeDecision-MakerConsultation RequiredApproval Process
Strategic DirectionExecutive Director + Advisory BoardCountry Leaders, community surveyBoard vote, published rationale
Framework ChangesGlobal Programme LeadAdvisory Board, impacted countriesPeer review + comment period
Country StrategyCountry LeaderCountry team, Global Programme LeadTeam input + global alignment check
Toolkit DevelopmentCo-Lead (Programme)Country Leader, target usersQuality review + pilot testing
Event PlanningCo-Lead (Community)Country LeaderBudget approval if >
Volunteer RecruitmentCountry Leader + Global Community LeadRole-specific team membersRubric-based assessment
Grievances (Minor)Country LeaderInvolved partiesDocumented resolution promptly
Grievances (Serious)Executive Director + independent partyAll parties, legal advice if neededFormal investigation, published outcome
How We Stay Accountable

Accountability & Transparency

Regular reporting, feedback mechanisms, and transparent performance tracking.

Reporting Cadence

Monthly

Country Leaders → Global team via project board updates

Quarterly

All Country Leaders → Formal progress report with KPIs

Annually

Global team → Public annual report with community survey results

Feedback Mechanisms

  • Anonymous Feedback: Quarterly survey for all volunteers
  • One-on-Ones: Monthly check-ins between leaders and supervisors
  • Community Forums: Open discussion channels for concerns
  • Retrospectives: After major projects or events

Key Performance Indicators

  • Deliverables completed on time and to quality standards
  • Volunteer satisfaction scores (quarterly survey)
  • Engagement metrics (active contributors per country)
  • Toolkit adoption and user feedback
  • Partnership quality and impact

Safeguarding & Oversight

  • Independent grievance officer (external to team)
  • Safeguarding policy with mandatory training
  • Code of Conduct enforcement procedures
  • Financial transparency (all expenditures published)
  • Advisory Board review of governance (annually)
Fair and Respectful Process

Conflict Resolution

Clear procedures for addressing concerns, disputes, and grievances at all levels.

Step-by-Step Resolution Process

We take all concerns seriously and handle them with confidentiality, fairness, and respect for all parties.

1

Direct Conversation (Preferred)

If comfortable, address the concern directly with the person involved. Many issues resolve quickly through respectful communication. Use "I" statements and focus on behaviour, not character.

Example: "I felt uncomfortable when [behaviour]. Could we discuss expectations around [topic]?"
2

Escalate to Supervisor

If direct conversation doesn't resolve the issue, or if you're uncomfortable approaching the person directly, contact your immediate supervisor (Co-Lead or Country Leader).

  • Supervisor mediates conversation between parties
  • Documented outcome and agreed actions
  • Follow-up check-in scheduled soon
3

Formal Grievance Process

For serious concerns or if previous steps haven't resolved the issue, submit a formal grievance to the Global Community Lead or independent grievance officer.

Serious Concerns Include:

  • • Harassment or discrimination
  • • Breach of Code of Conduct
  • • Abuse of authority
  • • Safeguarding concerns
  • • Persistent conflicts

Process Timeline:

  • • Acknowledgement: 1 business day
  • • Investigation: Completed promptly
  • • Decision: Made in timely manner
  • • Appeal window: Available
4

Independent Review (If Needed)

If you disagree with the grievance outcome, you can request review by an independent party (Advisory Board member or external mediator).

Confidentiality Guarantee

All grievances handled with strict confidentiality. Information shared only with those directly involved in resolution. No retaliation tolerated.

Contact Points for Concerns

General Issues

Your immediate supervisor

Serious Grievances

info@ethos.institute

Safeguarding Concerns

info@ethos.institute

Questions About Governance?

We're committed to transparent, accountable, and participatory governance.

Questions? Email info@ethos.institute